18 Comments

Absolutely LOVED this. Keep up the good work - and hope you have a great Xmas and New Year 🌟❤️🌟

Expand full comment

Phew, I thought this was going to be full of dark revelations about a columnist whose work I enjoy.

Expand full comment

Normally I just rant at the idiotic click bait headline and ignore him but today, fuck me, I had to agree with him. Why did they take the plastic lids off the yoghurt pots?

Expand full comment

Ha, I’m afraid I haven’t had the pleasure recently.

Expand full comment

Influenced by smaller minds, I have always dismissed him, unread. But you have guided me to the light!

Expand full comment

Well I enjoyed reading this significantly more than I have ever enjoyed one of those columns. And yet!

Expand full comment

Interesting how many of the same pieces you noticed as the Gawker piece from last year https://www.gawker.com/media/adrian-chiles-does-not-miss. Excited to see more entries in this series! As you note, it's Chiles self awareness but also his openness to others and knowing, intelligent inanity that makes the columns so compelling. I have no idea what he's like as a broadcaster but I imagine those same qualities make good programming too.

Expand full comment

Oh I missed that Gawker piece at the time – a great read, thank you. And, yes, he's definitely self-aware and, as the Gawker piece says, happy to hand over the best lines to others.

Expand full comment

This is just glorious, J. Instant subscribe (and the first thing to ever make me read one of his cols!)

Expand full comment

Thank you, M – hope I've managed your expectations! 😬

Expand full comment

I instinctively thought of Deborah Ross. This is pretty weird because I haven't read a column of hers for maybe a decade--I wonder if she has moved somewhere paywally. Hang on [uses search engine]. She now regularly does TV/film for the Spectator. I have a feeling I "don't like" the Spectator and maybe you don't either. But in the 90s/00s Ross had a column in the Independent that I loved. So if you were up to doing a historical column review, then hey pesto.

Today's post was excellent. I thought I wouldn't enjoy Adrian Chiles's column and now you have made me want to read it!

Expand full comment

Thank you! I mean, I didn't think I'd like it either, but it's short, and often insightful; it's not trying to *be* anything, which is perhaps its strength.

As for Deborah Ross, she appears to be at The Times now too, on a very similar beat to Mr Chiles, but with a higher word count. Will look up the old Indy stuff – I'd forgotten all about it. Cheers!

Expand full comment

Woo, brilliant! A higher wordcount, eek. I don't want to be the 'Hey let's read The Books Of Jacob for bookclub" person, though. Might actually do a trial sub to the Times to see what Deborah is up to these days :)

While I'm here, I'm a big, big fan of your three novels. (I hope that's not cheesy; I'm sure it is never bad to be told your writing is loved, eh?)

Expand full comment

That is indeed lovely to hear, thank you!

Expand full comment

Was expecting Arch mockery... or ironic appreciation - but the warmth and affection for an unaffected man with a platform he is happily bewildered by is welcomed. Thanks for this, we need to recognise a slow griftless genuineness that is seldom seen in the world x

Expand full comment

Thank you! He seems very aware of his own averageness and the column drips with self-deprecation, but in among the blistering takes and forensic analysis, his short meanderings on the everyday are welcome. I hesitate to use the word 'wholesome' because it's quite patronising but there is a gentleness to this column and that's no bad thing.

Expand full comment

Thank you. It always brightens my day when I read Adrian’s columns. Thanks also for this great idea of writing about a columnist. It’s brilliant

Expand full comment

Cheers!

Expand full comment